The Edge Report

Top Five Trends in Global Business Dynamics: Protectionism, Automation, and

The global business landscape is undergoing a profound transformation, driven

Em

Emily Zhang

June 21, 2026

8 min read
Top Five Trends in Global Business Dynamics: Protectionism, Automation, and

The global business landscape is undergoing a profound transformation, driven

Top Five Trends in Global Business Dynamics: Protectionism, Automation, and the Rise of Emerging Markets in 2025

The post-pandemic world has not settled into a new equilibrium. Instead, geopolitical tensions, persistent labour shortages, and the relentless march of artificial intelligence are rewriting the playbook for multinational corporations. According to Euromonitor International's 2025 report, five interconnected trends are reshaping global business dynamics: the fragmentation of supply chains through protectionist policies, an automation imperative born from STEM talent gaps, a concentration of R&D investment in the US and China, the rapid ascent of emerging manufacturing hubs such as India and Vietnam, and the pervasive integration of AI across industries. Beneath these surface-level shifts lies a hidden logic: the world is splitting into a two-speed economy, where advanced economies double down on high-value automated production while emerging markets absorb labour-intensive manufacturing. Companies that fail to navigate this volatility risk being left behind.

[IMAGE: A split visual: left side showing a factory floor with robots, right side showing a busy manual assembly line in a developing country.]

1. The Great Fragmentation: Protectionism Reshapes Supply Chains

For decades, global supply chains were optimised for cost efficiency, with China as the world's factory floor. That model is now under siege. Protectionist policies—from US tariffs on Chinese goods to Europe’s evolving carbon border adjustments—are forcing companies to rethink where they produce and source. The result is a dual shift: nearshoring, which brings manufacturing closer to end-consumer markets (e.g., from Mexico back to the US), and friendshoring, which strengthens ties with geopolitically aligned nations in Southeast Asia.

The data is telling. Between 2022 and 2024, Vietnam’s exports increased by 10% in US dollar terms, a clear signal of realignment away from China. Similarly, Mexico has become the top trading partner of the United States, overtaking China for the first time in two decades. This is not simply about cheaper labour; it is about resilience and regional bloc formation. Supply chain reshoring is creating distinct regulatory and standards regimes—the US pushing for semiconductor self-sufficiency under the CHIPS Act, the EU enforcing stricter environmental norms, and China aggressively building alternative trade corridors via the Belt and Road Initiative.

The strategic implication for businesses is profound: the era of a single, optimised global supply chain is over. Companies must build redundant, regionally focused networks. A manufacturer serving both North America and Europe can no longer run one factory in China and ship everywhere; it needs parallel operations in Vietnam or Mexico for the US market and perhaps in Eastern Europe for the EU. This fragmentation raises costs in the short term but reduces vulnerability to geopolitical shocks. Euromonitor International's 2025 report highlights that firms that have already diversified their supplier base report 30% fewer disruptions than those still reliant on single-region sourcing.

[IMAGE: A map of Asia and North America with arrows and trade flow lines, highlighting Vietnam, Mexico, and the US.]

2. The Automation Imperative: Labour Shortages Drive Tech Adoption

While protectionism pulls supply chains apart, labour shortages are pushing companies to invest heavily in automation and AI. The problem is acute across both developed and emerging economies, but it bites hardest in STEM fields. A 2024 survey by the World Economic Forum found that 69% of companies globally report difficulty filling specialised technical roles. The shortage is not merely a cyclical blip; it reflects a systemic mismatch between education systems and the skills demanded by modern manufacturing and services.

The symptoms are visible everywhere. JP Morgan, Amazon, and Boeing have mandated office attendance, partly to address productivity challenges that arise when teams lack the technical depth to collaborate effectively on complex problems. But forcing workers back to the office is a Band-Aid. The real solution, as Euromonitor International's 2025 report notes, lies in automation investments that substitute for missing human capital. Robotic arms, AI-powered quality inspection systems, and autonomous guided vehicles are proliferating in factories from Shenzhen to Stuttgart.

Yet automation is a double-edged sword. It solves short-term gaps by replacing routine tasks, but it widens the skills divide, putting enormous pressure on education systems to produce workers who can design, maintain, and improve automated systems. Countries that fail to reskill their workforces risk social friction even as productivity rises. This dynamic also correlates directly with R&D spending: the US and China, which dominate investment in innovation, are best positioned to deploy automation at scale, while smaller economies struggle to keep pace. The automation imperative thus reinforces the two-speed world: advanced economies race ahead, while labour-intensive emerging markets become the default destination for the jobs that robots cannot yet perform.

[IMAGE: A robotic arm assembling a circuit board alongside a chart showing declining STEM graduates per capita in selected regions.]

3. The US-China R&D Dominance: A Widening Innovation Gap

Global R&D investment is increasingly concentrated in just two countries. According to Euromonitor International's 2025 report, the United States and China together account for over 40% of global research and development spending. This concentration is not accidental; both governments have made strategic bets on technology leadership—the US through massive subsidies for semiconductors, AI, and biotech, and China through its "Made in China 2025" initiative and state-directed innovation funds.

The implications for global business dynamics are stark. Companies headquartered outside these two innovation hubs face a growing disadvantage in accessing cutting-edge technology. European and Japanese firms, once leaders in sectors like automotive and robotics, are increasingly dependent on US-designed chips or Chinese lithium-ion battery technology. Even in AI, where the US leads in foundational models, China has surged in application-based AI for manufacturing and logistics.

This R&D dominance creates a feedback loop: more innovation leads to better automation, which attracts capital, which further concentration. For multinational corporations, the strategic choice is whether to locate R&D facilities in the US or China to stay at the frontier, or risk falling behind. Some firms are adopting a "dual R&D" strategy—maintaining labs in both countries to hedge against decoupling. But this is expensive and requires navigating complex export controls. The US-China rivalry is not just about tariffs; it is about controlling the technological future.

[IMAGE: Two glowing nodes on a world map—one over the US and one over China—with radiating lines showing patent filings and R&D expenditure percentages.]

4. The Rise of Emerging Markets: India, Vietnam, and the New Manufacturing Frontier

While R&D remains concentrated, manufacturing is dispersing. The beneficiaries are emerging markets that offer a combination of low labour costs, improving infrastructure, and favourable trade agreements. Vietnam has become the poster child for friendshoring, attracting electronics assembly previously done in China. India is positioning itself as a manufacturing hub for both low-end consumer goods and high-tech components, buoyed by government production-linked incentive schemes.

Euromonitor International's 2025 report highlights that foreign direct investment into Southeast Asia and India grew by 15% in 2024, outpacing global FDI growth. This is not merely a relocation of low-wage jobs; it involves sophisticated supply chains for smartphones, solar panels, and electric vehicles. Vietnam now exports more than $100 billion annually to the US, while India’s electronics manufacturing sector has doubled in size since 2020.

But the rise of these markets is not automatic. Companies face challenges: inconsistent power supply, regulatory bottlenecks, and a shortage of skilled middle managers. The two-speed world means that emerging markets must carefully choose their lane. They cannot compete head-to-head with US or Chinese automation; instead, they should absorb labour-intensive manufacturing that advanced economies are shedding. For example, textile production and footwear assembly are shifting from China to Vietnam and Bangladesh, while higher-value assembly of electronics is moving to India and Thailand.

The strategic insight for businesses is to treat emerging markets not as cheap alternatives but as integral nodes in a fragmented network. The winners will be those that invest in local talent, build long-term partnerships, and adapt products to regional standards—rather than simply treating these markets as cost arbitrage opportunities.

[IMAGE: A collage showing a factory in Vietnam with workers assembling circuit boards, an Indian industrial park with new warehouses, and a small text overlay reading “FDI +15% (2024).”]

5. The Pervasive Impact of AI: From Automation to Augmentation

The final trend cuts across all others: the accelerating adoption of artificial intelligence. The Euromonitor International 2025 report draws on a global AI impact survey that reveals 72% of large enterprises have deployed AI in at least one business function, up from 45% in 2022. But the nature of AI deployment is shifting. Early waves focused on chatbots and customer service; the 2025 wave is about operational AI—machine learning models that optimise supply chains, predict maintenance needs, and control robotic systems.

AI’s pervasive impact is most visible in three areas. First, it enables the automation imperative by filling labour gaps: AI-powered vision systems can inspect products faster and more accurately than human workers. Second, it facilitates supply chain resiliency by predicting disruptions and rerouting shipments in real time. Third, it drives personalisation at scale, allowing even mid-sized manufacturers to offer customised products.

However, the AI impact survey also reveals a growing divide. Large companies with deep pockets are deploying custom AI models; small and medium enterprises often lack the data and expertise. This reinforces the two-speed dynamic: the technology gap between AI-rich and AI-poor firms is widening. For global business trends to remain inclusive, policymakers must invest in digital infrastructure and training programs that democratise AI access.

The hidden logic is that AI is not just a tool; it is becoming the operating system of the global economy. Companies that embed AI into their core processes will gain a compound advantage in cost, speed, and innovation. Those that treat it as a peripheral add-on will struggle to survive.

[IMAGE: A data dashboard showing AI adoption rates across industries, with a heatmap of 72% adoption in large enterprises versus 34% in SMEs.]

Conclusion: Navigating the Two-Speed World

The five trends explored here—supply chain fragmentation, the automation imperative, US-China R&D dominance, the rise of emerging markets, and pervasive AI—are not independent. They form a coherent picture of a global economy splitting into two speeds. In the fast lane, the US and China concentrate innovation and automation, producing high-value goods with fewer workers. In the slow lane, emerging markets absorb labour-intensive manufacturing, growing but vulnerable to technology disruption.

For business leaders, the path forward requires strategic clarity. First, build resilient, regionally focused supply chains rather than a single global network—this means accepting higher costs for greater security. Second, invest aggressively in automation and AI to address labour shortages, but pair these investments with workforce reskilling to avoid social backlash. Third, deepen R&D partnerships in the US and China, even as geopolitical tensions rise, because staying on the technology frontier is non-negotiable. Fourth, engage with emerging markets not as cost-saving destinations but as long-term partners in a fragmented landscape.

The Euromonitor International 2025 report provides a roadmap, but the journey is uncertain. One thing is clear: the old rules of global business are gone. Those who adapt to the two-speed world will find opportunity amid volatility. Those who cling to past models will be left behind.

[IMAGE: A stylized world map in muted blue and grey tones, with glowing orange nodes over the United States, China, Southeast Asia, and India. Dashed arrows show shifting supply chain routes. Small icons of robot arms, semiconductor chips, and factory buildings. Soft digital grid lines suggest data flow.]